Amazon S3 Goes Down
Netcraft has a great story about Amazon downtime. For what looks like roughly a day, their Alexa portal experienced extremely high latencies. Perhaps we should give them a new logo to represent their downsides:

I’ve always been against third-party web services solutions. What happens when they go down? It’s not a matter of if they go down, but rather when. No matter how many different locations you have, how many servers in your cluster, you will eventually experience a natural disaster, and lose connectivity. Until there’s some better way to maintain uptime, not prone to natural disaster, failure, or human error, you’re better off running your own systems.
| This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 21st, 2006 at 9:40 pm and is tagged with . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback. |
4 Responses to “Amazon S3 Goes Down”
Leave a Reply



So if you were in Amazon’s shoe, how would you architect the solution for Amazon?
BTW, nice new logo for Amazon, I would have replaced the arrow with another, one pointing right down
“I’ve always been against third-party web services solutions.” Have you ever worked in enterprise IT? Jeez.
Yes, I work in Enterprise IT.
Absolutely wrong. When done properly, third-party web services and hosting solutions can be extremely reliable and cost-effective. Many of our hosting and web clients are on a great hosting platform that have redundant backup and daily or weekly backups to S3 storage. We weren’t down a single time last year.
By the way — regarding this web form — what is the point of a custom CSS style to make the text I’m typing lighter? The goal is to see what you type.
This is a good example where design and functionality go separate ways.