The NYT (reg. required) reports that theories of voting fraud are unfounded.
This entry was posted on Saturday, November 13th, 2004 at 2:54 pm and is tagged with fraud, nyt. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback.
search site archives
Today I experienced credit card fraud on my Chase Bank Card. It only has a $1000 limit, so the potential for damage was limited.
"Something has to be done about this really really quickly," says George Reyes, CFO of Google. Click fraud is a way to milk money
A few "interesting" transactions showed up on my debit card in the last few days, but they're not mine: Pending POS DEBIT OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC SAN DIEGO
Earlier this morning I left a comment on a post of Fovergeek's where he complains that Digg is unfairly banning him: There's a possible explanation for
Google CEO says that click fraud is ok; a gloss reads, "just let it happen, and it will sort itself out."
fraud, county, claims, paul, iglesias, hampshire, rights, evidence, kucinich, texas, upholds, rush, voting, voter, australia, daggett, limbaugh, ohio, there, york, vote, 0, serebrov, primary, bloomberg
Results by WP From / Where
Add New Comment
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)