RSS Ethics
Scoble strongheadedly defends his full-text linkblog as the intended use of RSS syndication formats:
By publishing RSS as full text you’re buying into a system where your words will be republished in a variety of ways.
RSS is simply an XML format for encoding data. Just like HTML, Word Doc, PDF, .java, or any other format, people are able to do many things, but legally constrained from doing some of them. That includes republishing my content, to which I have excusive rights under US copyright law. Scoble, you could get sued for your “link blog.”
Let’s take a look at an example, to the absurd. MP3 is an audio format for online transmitting and publishing of music. Say, for example, that I write a song, encode it as an MP3 file, and then post that file online. Does anyone have the right to republish or redistribute my song? No! Not without my permission. By anology, RSS is another format for online transmission and publication of text data.
Rights to RSS context belong exclusively to their owner.
This entry was posted on Thursday, March 24th, 2005 at 3:19 am and is tagged with doc pdf, mp3 file, xml format, scoble, word doc, copyright law, many things, ethics, syndication, music. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback.

Add New Comment
Viewing 2 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)