The Schiavo Controversy
In the Schiavo case, her critical mistake lies in the following:
The United States of America provides a legal mechanism by which one can dictate the quality and length of life support in brain-damaged conditions. It’s a mechanism of making your will known when you are otherwise incapacitated, but still alive. And it’s the mechanism that Terri Schiavo should have used to dictate the extent of her life support. Since she hasn’t, the decisions made about her life support are arbitrary and fair. If she receives full support until her body gives out, or if she receives none, it’s the same.
Some other opinions:
- http://hereticalideas.com/index.php?p=2830
- http://www.poppolitics.com/archives/000120.html
- http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2005/03/jeb-to-seek-custody.html
- http://newcovenant.blogspot.com/2005/03/how-undignified.html
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schiavo
- http://www.professorbainbridge.com/2005/03/limited_governm.html
This entry was posted on Friday, March 25th, 2005 at 5:59 pm and is tagged with critical mistake, gatewaypundit, poppolitics, legal mechanism, schiavo case, terri schiavo, wikipedia, jeb, states of america, controversy, united states of america, extent, blogspot, brain, decisions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback.

Add New Comment
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)