Mark Cuban’s P2P Ideas Suck
In a three-part rant about peer-to-peer technologies (1, 2, 3), Mark Cuban demands that peer-to-peer technologies “die a quick death” in order to”speed up [his own] internet connection.” He suggests that “Google Video is a far better solution for audio and video distribution than any P2P solution” and that cable companies “charge for upstream bandwidth usage.”
Guess what–I already get charged for all the bandwidth I use, either up or down. When Verizon strings a fiberoptic cable to my home, I’m getting a certain amount of fixed capacity into the greater internet at large. If I want to trade a little upstream capacity for greater downstream capacity, that’s my call! Have you ever noticed that downloading over http is typically slow because there are 100s of clients and 1 host? If I download the same information over bittorrent, I can sustain 12Mbs because everyone is a server–including me. Distributed protocols, such as the ones powering Amazon Dynamo or bittorrent, are more efficient, cost effective, and fault tolerant than single-server models.
Reactions around the blogosphere indicate that Mark Cuban’s thoughts on P2P are nonsensical rubbish. Mashable calls him “a guy who does not understand how P2P works, and yet he wants it shut down.” Ars Technica notes that “if users who are currently saturating their connections with BitTorrent start saturating their connections with Google Video content, the end result is more or less the same.” And a slashdotter comments, “Just imagine how fast the internet would be if there were no content to view. After P2Ps gone, get rid of all these freeloading websites, emails, etc. and it will be blisteringly fast.”
My guess is that billionaire Mark Cuban has a slow, shared cable internet connection at home, the modern equivalent of a party line. This might lead him to confuse his own slow internet connection with a greater systemic problem. What he should be complaining about is why Verizon hasn’t strung fiber in his area yet.
This entry was posted on Sunday, November 25th, 2007 at 7:50 pm and is tagged with slow internet connection, cable internet connection, server models, bandwidth usage, fiberoptic cable, quick death, systemic problem, google, mark cuban, video distribution, amazon, mashable, better solution, cable companies, video content, billionaire, dynamo, end result, blogosphere, rubbish. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback.
2 Responses to 'Mark Cuban’s P2P Ideas Suck'
Leave a Reply
Fresh, related resources:
- Mark Cuban’s P2P Ideas Suck
Mashable calls him “a guy who does not understand how P2P works, and yet he wants it shut down.” Ars Technica notes that “if users who… Original post by http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ElliottBack/~3/190454649/ - Mark Cuban’s P2P Ideas Suck
Reactions around the blogosphere indicate that Mark Cuban’s thoughts on P2P are nonsensical rubbish. Mashable calls him “a guy who does not understand how P2P works, and yet he wants it shut down.” Ars Technica notes that “if users who ... - Stupid Idea Of The Week: Stop All P2P Traffic
Ah, that Mark Cuban. The guy made some money back in the dot.com bubble days and now he keeps on entertaining us with his visions of how technology should work. This time, he’s ranting about P2P; two of his assertions are particularly ...
on November 26th, 2007 at 2:54 pm
I can’t believe how STUPID he is about this issue. And then when he gets a bunch of comments from people who disagree with him, he puts up a post asking if he should allow unmoderated comments, where he says the comments have been getting nastier. Well, if you are going to say stupid things, what do you expect? Hmm?
on December 3rd, 2007 at 3:35 pm
I definitely agree that Cuban is way off the mark on this one. I do, however, like the fact that he’s at least started a dialog about the subject. It’s definitely something I’d love to see some progress on.