<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BIOShock PC: Initial Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/bioshock-pc-initial-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/bioshock-pc-initial-impressions/</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:40:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/bioshock-pc-initial-impressions/#comment-805297</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/08/21/bioshock-pc-initial-impressions/#comment-805297</guid>
		<description>Best plot since Halo?....er, thank god for dumb Xbox fps fans to help the sales of this game.  Maybe they can make a new System Shock now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best plot since Halo?&#8230;.er, thank god for dumb Xbox fps fans to help the sales of this game.  Maybe they can make a new System Shock now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shige</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/bioshock-pc-initial-impressions/#comment-793633</link>
		<dc:creator>Shige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/08/21/bioshock-pc-initial-impressions/#comment-793633</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t it say 1960 when you start?  Not 1940s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t it say 1960 when you start?  Not 1940s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/bioshock-pc-initial-impressions/#comment-793184</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/08/21/bioshock-pc-initial-impressions/#comment-793184</guid>
		<description>After running through the PC demo a week after checking out the 360 demo, I&#039;ve got to agree that for PC, it just feels like a sloppy port. I read a blurb from Take 2 not long ago mentioning that they had two totally different teams doing both UI&#039;s... but to me you&#039;d have no idea.

Just makes you wonder how much different this game would be had it been developed for PC only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After running through the PC demo a week after checking out the 360 demo, I&#8217;ve got to agree that for PC, it just feels like a sloppy port. I read a blurb from Take 2 not long ago mentioning that they had two totally different teams doing both UI&#8217;s&#8230; but to me you&#8217;d have no idea.</p>
<p>Just makes you wonder how much different this game would be had it been developed for PC only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/bioshock-pc-initial-impressions/#comment-793133</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/08/21/bioshock-pc-initial-impressions/#comment-793133</guid>
		<description>Its a sloppy port to PC.  Some keys cannot be rebound, rendering the game unplayable for me (a lefty).

For petes sake map all of the letters of the alphabet at least.

The Quake Wars beta even looks better, and its a beta...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a sloppy port to PC.  Some keys cannot be rebound, rendering the game unplayable for me (a lefty).</p>
<p>For petes sake map all of the letters of the alphabet at least.</p>
<p>The Quake Wars beta even looks better, and its a beta&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
