Comments on: Bold Claims for Windows Vista

By: mkb

mkb — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:34:51 +0000

windows vista the beta 2 looks realy good i tested it the other day the kernal file has been updated and suports a lot more drivers most programs will have to be updated tho in order to run especsialy cd burning software since the drivers have been moved i belive but this is all minor set backs how ever i belive that the min requiments should be stated higher than need to be i was actuly runing it on a windows virtual machine since i couldnt be botherd to format and my 2.8ghz with only 1024mb of which only 400m was dedicated to the virutal machine to run it and the prossesor was still runing xp fine it still loaded very quick and was very responseive if any 1 wants pics plz email me im more than happy 2 send them michael.bourke@lycos.co.uk no spam plz

By: shaun

shaun — Sun, 19 Mar 2006 06:47:28 +0000

Whoa dude thats a load of cr@p why should i have to have 2ghz, i dont think so!!!! i have a 1.7 pent 4 overclocked to 2.1 with 1 gb of ddr3200 ram (CL 2.5) my board is a asus p4b266-c with an ati9600 128mb sdram and im running windows xp pro and my computer is so fast i wanna kick ur butt just for saying that lol sorry but dude i think my pute is great and i would never put 98 on it lol anyhow PCE

By: carlos

carlos — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:18:04 +0000

i’m agree with aphir.

By: Aphyr

Aphyr — Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:15:28 +0000

Daniel, I suspect that making Vista less usable across the existing computer base is only going to slow its growth. Having to upgrade my hardware to run a new operating system is not a good incentive to upgrade at all–it essentially increases the cost of the platform.

By: Michele

Michele — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:17:07 +0000

I’d be impressed if they hyped about it less and actually released it.