<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Elliott C. Back &#187; Cingular</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/category/cingular/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iPhone:  Will it have 3rd party apps?</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/iphone-will-it-have-3rd-party-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/iphone-will-it-have-3rd-party-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cingular]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/01/13/iphone-will-it-have-3rd-party-apps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People keep going back and forth on whether we&#8217;ll be able to write our own applications for the iPhone.  Since it runs a version of OSX on an ARM processor, there should be a rich set of APIs for graphics, file system IO, net applications, and UI.  We know that Apple&#8217;s OSX Quartz [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People keep going back and forth on whether we&#8217;ll be able to write our own applications for the iPhone.  Since it runs a version of OSX on an ARM processor, there should be a rich set of APIs for graphics, file system IO, net applications, and UI.  We know that Apple&#8217;s OSX Quartz API was recently modified to allow resolutions differing from 72dpi by introducing the notion of &#8220;scale.&#8221;  Their software is ripe for 3rd party applications on the iPhone, and we know from their Yahoo / Google partnerships that non-apple software will already be running on the iPhone.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.applegazette.com/mac/no-3rd-party-apps-for-iphone-false/">Apple Gazette</a> theorizes that Cingular doesn&#8217;t want developers writing replacements for their for-fee services.  He quotes Steve Jobs&#8217; lame excuse for restricted application access:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;These are devices that need to work, and you can&#8217;t do that if you load any software on them,&#8221; he said. &#8220;That doesn&#8217;t mean there&#8217;s not going to be software to buy that you can load on them coming from us. It doesn&#8217;t mean we have to write it all, but it means it has to be more of a controlled environment.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Probably Cingular and Apple are worried about a few things:</p>
<ul>
<li>A security hole is found and a virus can spread through iPhones at a lightening pace</li>
<li>3rd party applications reduce Cingular&#8217;s for-pay applications&#8217; appeal</li>
<li>3rd party applications mean Apple can&#8217;t control their branded UI</li>
<li>A very good 3rd party application could make the iPhone more popular for that application that for the device itself, leading to a watering down of the Apple brand recognition</li>
</ul>
<p><img id="image2071" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/iphone-ie.jpg" alt="iphone-ie.jpg" /></p>
<p>Worst case scenario:  Apple releases the iPhone SDK and immediately Microsoft IE 7 is ported to the iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/iphone-will-it-have-3rd-party-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CES: Apple iPhone</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/ces-apple-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/ces-apple-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cingular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/01/09/ces-apple-iphone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple, Inc is up 8% in the stock market after they announced a new cross-technology product at Macworld 2007 today, the Apple iPhone:

The iPhone is a smart phone running some version of OSX, sporting a wide-screen touch-sensitive display, iTunes, Safari, Widgets, and other mac apps, 8 GB of Flash Storage, support for GSM, Wifi, Bluetooth, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple, Inc is up 8% in the stock market after they announced a new cross-technology product at Macworld 2007 today, the Apple <strong>iPhone</strong>:</p>
<p><a id="p2062" rel="attachment" class="imagelink" href="http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/01/09/ces-apple-iphone/iphonejpg/" title="iphone.jpg"><img id="image2062" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/iphone.jpg" alt="iphone.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>The iPhone is a smart phone running some version of OSX, sporting a wide-screen touch-sensitive display, iTunes, Safari, Widgets, and other mac apps, 8 GB of Flash Storage, support for GSM, Wifi, Bluetooth, and Edge networks, 5 hours of talk time, and 16 hours of music time.  The phone is just 11mm thick, and will go for $599 ($100 less for a 4GB version) exclusively from Cingular.  Deals were also announced with Yahoo for push-mail, and Google for Maps. Some problems with this in the future:</p>
<ul>
<li>Vendor tie in w/ Cingular will limit market share</li>
<li>Availability will be a big issue&#8211;can Apple meet the demand?</li>
<li>Battery-life issues will be important.  Everything here is innovative, except for battery life, which has not improved</li>
<li>Can Cingular provide the iPhone with enough bandwidth?</li>
<li>Scratching, smudging and assorted damage to the touch-screen</li>
<li>TM lawsuits from Cisco / Linksys, who own the iPhone trademark</li>
<li>Lack of open standards for programming in the new &#8220;OSX-like&#8221; iPhone OS</li>
</ul>
<p>I predict, like the iPod v1.0, future versions of the iPhone will solve these problems and more.  I&#8217;m still buying one in June, though!  <strong>Update:</strong> Engadget has a nice comparison of the size of this baby <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/apple-iphone-sized-up-and-compared-to-treo-750-moto-q-and-bb-p/">on their blog</a>.  It&#8217;s a nice size!</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=elliottback-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=13&#038;l=ur1&#038;category=wireless&#038;banner=0SESQPYNEXXSWMYDWG02&#038;f=ifr" width="468" height="60" scrolling="no" border="0" marginwidth="0" style="border:none;" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/ces-apple-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Buy Mobile, NYC New York</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/best-buy-mobile-nyc-new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/best-buy-mobile-nyc-new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 02:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cingular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deals & Savings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/12/02/best-buy-mobile-nyc-new-york/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Engadget mentioned the Best Buy Mobile that just opened in Times Square NYC, I thought I&#8217;d drop by for a couple pictures of the store itself:

While I was there, I got to peek at a few older-gen phones, none of which impressed me much.  The White Chocolate by LG is quite nice, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Engadget mentioned the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/28/best-buy-mobile-opens-up-shop-in-new-york/">Best Buy Mobile</a> that just opened in Times Square NYC, I thought I&#8217;d drop by for a couple pictures of the store itself:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/elliott-back/311519601/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/106/311519601_737a6898c9.jpg" width="450" alt="Best Buy NYC" /></a></p>
<p>While I was there, I got to peek at a few older-gen phones, none of which impressed me much.  The <em>White Chocolate by LG</em> is quite nice, but it&#8217;s bulky and clunky-looking, much like the Zune:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/elliott-back/311519866/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/115/311519866_59ae90c4d7.jpg" width="450" alt="White Chocolate LG" /></a></p>
<p>This <em>Sony Ericsson Walkman</em> phone is much the same&#8211;cool, but too big for my tastes.  I want something sleeker:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/elliott-back/311519742/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/111/311519742_d7f5e31d65.jpg" width="450" alt="Sony Ericsson" /></a></p>
<p>Why is it that nothing substantially better in form factor and sexiness than the Razor V3 has hit US markets yet?  I want a metal-cased phone, slim, contoured, with fancy edging and detail touches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/best-buy-mobile-nyc-new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
