<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Elliott C. Back &#187; Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/category/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IE8: Acid Test Passes</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/ie8-acid-test-passes/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/ie8-acid-test-passes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spread IE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/03/06/ie8-acid-test-passes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ll be surprised to see that Internet Explorer 8 Beta (8.0.6001.14184) does better on the Acid2 test than Firefox 2 (2.0.0.12) does:

Safari also passes the Acid2 test, but nobody uses it
The results are far worse on the Acid3 test, with IE8 scoring 17% and Firefox scoring 50%, but I believe they are intended.  See, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll be surprised to see that Internet Explorer 8 Beta (8.0.6001.14184) does better on the <a href="http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html#top">Acid2 test</a> than Firefox 2 (2.0.0.12) does:</p>
<p><img id="image2564" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/acid2-ff-vs-ie.png" alt="acid2-ff-vs-ie.png" /><br />
<small>Safari also passes the Acid2 test, but nobody uses it</small></p>
<p>The results are far worse on the Acid3 test, with IE8 scoring 17% and Firefox scoring 50%, but I believe they are intended.  See, when Microsoft releases Beta 2 of their browser, it will definitely pass the Acid3 tests to give the community just that much more shock and awe:</p>
<p><img id="image2565" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/acid3-firefox-vs-ie.png" alt="acid3-firefox-vs-ie.png" /><br />
<small>Safari gets 39%, yay?</small></p>
<p>Ironically, the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/ie8/features.mspx">IE8 website</a> throws an error when viewed with IE8.  I guess that&#8217;s what they mean by improved standards compliance:</p>
<p><img id="image2566" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/ie8-error.png" alt="ie8-error.png" /></p>
<p>Worse, the <em>Official Microsoft Site</em> prompts to install some nasty, spyware-looking ActiveX control to view the IE8 site:</p>
<p><img id="image2567" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/active-x.png" alt="active-x.png" /></p>
<p>Congratulations Microsoft, on <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2007/12/19/internet-explorer-8-and-acid2-a-milestone.aspx">passing the Acid2</a>, but unfortunately you have a laundry list of things to do, not limited to (a) make it faster and lighter than Firefox, (b) build in good developer tools, (c) get rid of ActiveX, (d) make a more usable UI, or (e) fix your own website to work in IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/ie8-acid-test-passes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safari 3 Windows Review, Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spread IE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/06/11/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Safari has a new version, and a new platform.  The once mac-only web browser has released Safari 3 for Windows XP, backed by claims of UI, performance, and integration superiority.  The claims are that it is 2x faster in Javascript and HTML rendering, a claim we plan to test ourselves.  Note that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari has a new version, and a new platform.  The once mac-only web browser has released <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">Safari 3 for Windows XP</a>, backed by claims of UI, performance, and integration superiority.  The claims are that it is 2x faster in Javascript and HTML rendering, a claim we plan to test ourselves.  Note that Safari, the first time it was launched, took about a minute to start up and froze the screen for that time.  Only after that did it open fast.</p>
<p><img id="image2289" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/safari.jpg" alt="safari.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong>Javascript Performance Results</strong></p>
<p>So, their biggest claim is Javascript performance, which they show like so:</p>
<p><img id="image2290" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/js-performance.jpg" alt="js-performance.jpg" /></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll combine the overall results from these benchmarks together:</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.computerbytesman.com/js/jsbench/dobench.htm?">JS/Bench</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.gloo.ru/app/jsbenchmarks/DHTMLBenchmark.aspx">DHTML Benchmark</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.yui-ext.com/playpen/selectors/">DOM Query Test</a></li>
<li><a href="http://celtickane.com/projects/jsspeed.php">JS Speed Tests</a></li>
</ol>
<p>We find that depending how you look at it, Safari can actually be considered <strong>3x slower than IE7</strong>, or roughly of equal speed.  Here is an overall performance chart, with two columns&#8211;one is the raw average score, the other averages the worst-test group (three results) into one result and averages it:</p>
<p><img id="image2291" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/overall.png" alt="overall.png" /><br />
<small>Safari doesn&#8217;t break much ground here</small></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the per-test chart, which shows Safari kicking ass in the first test, losing the next three, tying the fourth with IE, and doing well again on the last test:</p>
<p><img id="image2292" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/pertest.png" alt="pertest.png" /></p>
<p><strong>Other annoyances</strong></p>
<p>Interestingly, Apple tries to bundle Safari with not one, but three separate Apple products:  Quicktime, Bonjour, and Apple Update.  On top of that, they break the back-mousebutton click  that I&#8217;ve become used to using in IE/FF, and use tons of my RAM main memory up.  No one sums it up better than <a href="http://devhints.wordpress.com/2007/03/09/safari-isnt-the-beauty-that-apple-likes-to-claim/">Dev Hints</a> who notes that &#8220;Safari Isn’t the Beauty That Apple Likes To Claim.&#8221;  It&#8217;s not bad, and it&#8217;s getting better, but there are still bugs to be worked out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
