<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Elliott C. Back &#187; MP3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/category/mp3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iPhone MP3 skipping, works in iTunes?</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/iphone-mp3-skipping-works-in-itunes/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/iphone-mp3-skipping-works-in-itunes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/?p=3088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just synced an mp3 album I had downloaded and copied into iTunes on my iPhone (1st gen, not a 3G), but every song was stuttering and skipping.  The files themselves are fine&#8211;they all play fine in iTunes.  The file I was trying to play had the following attributes:
Bitrate: 96 kbps
Encoder: FhG
Tags: ID3 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just synced an mp3 album I had downloaded and copied into iTunes on my iPhone (1st gen, not a 3G), but every song was stuttering and skipping.  The files themselves are fine&#8211;they all play fine in iTunes.  The file I was trying to play had the following attributes:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Bitrate:</strong> 96 kbps<br />
<strong>Encoder:</strong> FhG<br />
<strong>Tags:</strong> ID3 v1/v2<br />
<strong>Sample Rate:</strong> 44.100 khz</p></blockquote>
<p>Trolling through online forums, the following advice was offered:</p>
<ul>
<li>Use the &#8220;Rock EQ&#8221; preset (didn&#8217;t work for me, and I tried turning EQ Off / Soundcheck On/Off too)</li>
<li>Restore the iPhone (that sounds like a pain)</li>
<li>Delete the playlist and remove all the songs from the phone, then create a new playlist and resync them</li>
<li>Convert the music to AAC (right-click, convert to AAC)</li>
</ul>
<p>Since the last option is the easiest, I tried it.  And it worked&#8211;smooth playback.  It&#8217;s possible that there really was something horrible with the files, as they stutter in VLC too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/iphone-mp3-skipping-works-in-itunes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Zune 2.0 matter?</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/does-the-zune-20-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/does-the-zune-20-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 04:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/10/13/does-the-zune-20-matter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Zune 2.0 is coming out, but with more of a whimper than a bang.  The new features include new flash models, a black 80GB hard drive model, WiFi syncing, podcast and recorded TV support, according to An in-depth look at the new Zune lineup by Ars Technica.  Additionally, these new features will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Zune 2.0 is coming out, but with more of a whimper than a bang.  The new features include new flash models, a black 80GB hard drive model, WiFi syncing, podcast and recorded TV support, according to <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071003-an-in-depth-look-at-the-new-zune-lineup.html">An in-depth look at the new Zune lineup</a> by Ars Technica.  Additionally, these new features will be made available to Zune 1.0 users through a firmware update.</p>
<p><img id="image2445" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/zune-zune.jpg" alt="zune-zune.jpg" /></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/gartenberg/archives/2007/10/zunes_messaging.html">Is this a new product announcement or an apology?</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The Zune 2 is basically what the Zune 1 should have been.  Its online music store / syncing tool has been rewritten to be as easy to use as iTunes.  Hopefully this new Zune will sell more than the paltry 1.2 million units its predecessor sold, but I&#8217;m not optimistic.  Now that Apple has released their touch-based devices, Microsoft, and every other portable device maker not using touchscreens, is simply a loser.  Why would I buy a device with a tiny screen to watch movies on when I can buy a device that removes all the clunky wheel controls and fills all the available space with a gorgeous widescreen?</p>
<p>Specification-wise, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/03/zune-vs-ipod-specification-smackdown/">new Zune and iPod touch are basically identical</a>, but interface wise, its a completely different story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/does-the-zune-20-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIAA gets pound of flesh in court case win</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/riaa-gets-pound-of-flesh-in-court-case-win/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/riaa-gets-pound-of-flesh-in-court-case-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/10/05/riaa-gets-pound-of-flesh-in-court-case-win/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished reading this Ars Technica article detailing the case Capitol Records v. Jammie Thomas, where a jury delivered 24 guilty counts of infringement after four hours of deliberation and two days of testimony.  Because the infringement was determined willful, they awarded $9,250 in statutory damages per song, for a total of $222,000 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished reading this <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071004-verdict-is-in.html">Ars Technica</a> article detailing the case <em>Capitol Records v. Jammie Thomas</em>, where a jury delivered 24 guilty counts of infringement after four hours of deliberation and two days of testimony.  Because the infringement was determined <em>willful</em>, they awarded $9,250 in statutory damages per song, for a total of $222,000 in damages.</p>
<p>Jammie Thomas, a single mother, was identified by MAC and IP address, and her KaZaa username <em>tereastarr</em> which she used with other websites.  Interestingly, the plaintiff&#8217;s made the argument that the &#8220;eclectic musical tastes&#8221; reflected in the KaZaa shared music folder were consistent with Jammie Thomas&#8217;s actual tastes.</p>
<p>The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/business/media/05music.html?_r=1&#038;ex=1349323200&#038;en=f220c86195e7b662&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss&#038;oref=slogin">reports the actually scary, precedent-setting</a> part of this case:</p>
<blockquote><p>Michael J. Davis of Federal District Court, ruled in the industry’s favor on a hotly contested technical question, saying that for jurors to find her liable, the record labels did not have to prove that songs on Ms. Thomas’s computer had actually been transmitted to others online. Rather, the act of making them available could be viewed as infringement, the judge ruled.</p></blockquote>
<p>I hope this is appealed, as loaning a CD to a friend is also an act of making &#8220;music available for copying,&#8221; and the precedent is both technically incorrect and stifling to freedoms Americans take for granted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/riaa-gets-pound-of-flesh-in-court-case-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon&#8217;s iTunes-Compatible DRM-Free Music Store</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/amazons-itunes-compatible-drm-free-music-store/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/amazons-itunes-compatible-drm-free-music-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/09/25/amazons-itunes-compatible-drm-free-music-store/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Amazon Mp3 store gives you 256 Kb/s MP3 files without any DRM, for generally $8.99 an album.  They are already ripping iTunes up on quality, price, and digital rights management.  Expect them to continue to improve their selection (Amazon is famous for long tail) and interface, at which point no one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/163856011/ref=topnav_storetab_dm_hp_nav_lk/105-1201370-7946809">Amazon Mp3 store</a> gives you 256 Kb/s MP3 files without any DRM, for generally $8.99 an album.  They are already ripping iTunes up on quality, price, and digital rights management.  Expect them to continue to improve their selection (Amazon is <em>famous</em> for long tail) and interface, at which point no one will buy Steve Jobs&#8217; crippled music.  </p>
<p><img id="image2438" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/amazon-mp3.png" alt="amazon-mp3.png" /></p>
<p>Even better, Amazon&#8217;s system integrates cleanly with iTunes.  You can one-click buy an album from Amazon, and their downloader will pick up the .amz file, grab your tracks, and automatically add them to your iTunes library.  I&#8217;m also a big fan of the cover-flow like Album pickers they float on some of the mp3 pages:</p>
<p><img id="image2439" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/amazon-coverflow.png" alt="amazon-coverflow.png" /></p>
<p>Paul has it right when he says &#8220;<a href="http://paulstamatiou.com/2007/09/25/first-impressions-amazon-mp3-beta/">Amazon MP3 is kicking ass and taking names</a>.&#8221;  You can also check out the <a href="http://amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK1GR94T4PJ38D6/105-2763734-2328457?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&#038;pf_rd_s=center-7&#038;pf_rd_r=1GK4TX1NXDSYSCNMJ0NB&#038;pf_rd_t=101&#038;pf_rd_p=249703901&#038;pf_rd_i=5174">official blog post</a> or <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/25/game-on-a-real-alternative-to-itunes/">Techcrunch</a>, who notes they are carrying 2,000,000 songs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/amazons-itunes-compatible-drm-free-music-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pink Zune Released in 100,000 Units</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/pink-zune-released-in-100000-units/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/pink-zune-released-in-100000-units/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 05:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/04/08/pink-zune-released-in-100000-units/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The once exclusive Pink ZUNE has come, and they are legion!  100,000 units of the elusive pink zune will be product, according to Engadget.  It&#8217;s not quite the same as the magenta zune, though, whose quantities limited less than a 1000:

Now the Zune comes in colors of white, black, brown, and pink.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The once exclusive <strong>Pink ZUNE</strong> has come, and they are legion!  100,000 units of the elusive pink zune will be product, according to Engadget.  It&#8217;s not quite the same as the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/28/zune-oddnesses-zune-pretty-in-pink-zune-on-a-mac/">magenta zune</a>, though, whose quantities limited less than a 1000:</p>
<p><img src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pink-zune.jpg" alt="" title="pink-zune" width="450" height="785" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2991" /></p>
<p>Now the Zune comes in colors of white, black, brown, and pink.  I&#8217;d personally hope for a metallic purple, silver, green, and blue set as well, but it seems that Apple has a monopoly on pretty mp3 playing devices.  Phooey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/pink-zune-released-in-100000-units/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
