<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Elliott C. Back &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/category/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Last.FM, the RIAA, and TechCrunch</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/lastfm-the-riaa-and-techcrunch/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/lastfm-the-riaa-and-techcrunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 13:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2P]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/?p=3109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechCrunch refuses to let their claim that Last.FM gave CBS user data which was passed onto the RIAA lie.  In a post called Deny This, Last FM, they claim that:
CBS requested user data from Last.fm, including user name and IP address. CBS wanted the data to comply with a RIAA request but told Last.fm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechCrunch refuses to let their claim that Last.FM gave CBS user data which was passed onto the RIAA lie.  In a post called <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/22/deny-this-lastfm/">Deny This, Last FM</a>, they claim that:</p>
<blockquote><p>CBS requested user data from Last.fm, including user name and IP address. CBS wanted the data to comply with a RIAA request but told Last.fm the data was going to be used for &#8220;internal use only.&#8221; It was only after the data was sent to CBS that Last.fm discovered the real reason for the request. Last.fm staffers were outraged, say our sources, but the data had already been sent to the RIAA.</p></blockquote>
<p>Reddit has noticed that <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/8mt35/lastfm_user_data_was_sent_to_riaa_by_cbs/">TechCrunch is censoring comments critical of the post</a>.  Last.FM emphatically <a href="http://www.last.fm/forum/21717/_/535934/5">denies handing over the data</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Any suggestion that we were complicit in transferring user data to any third party is incorrect.  [...] It really seems like someone is trying to slander us here.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s a more realistic, simpler explanation of what happened&#8211;one that wouldn&#8217;t require any special access to Last.FM&#8217;s private user data at all.  The RIAA either asked CBS for the data, or got it themselves, from the public song timeline of Last.FM users.  For example, at <a href="http://www.last.fm/user/elliottback/tracks">http://www.last.fm/user/elliottback/tracks</a> you can download ~400 pages of songs I&#8217;ve listened to:</p>
<p><img src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/lastfm-timeline.png" alt="lastfm-timeline" title="lastfm-timeline" width="450" height="257" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3113" /></p>
<p>This gives them the following data: user, song, time.  This is enough to tell that a user is listening to unreleased music, which is probably part of what the RIAA would use in trying to make a case against music pirates.  For example&#8211;the Eminem Relapse album came out on May 15th, so theoretically anyone listening to it before then is a pirate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/lastfm-the-riaa-and-techcrunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone MP3 skipping, works in iTunes?</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/iphone-mp3-skipping-works-in-itunes/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/iphone-mp3-skipping-works-in-itunes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/?p=3088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just synced an mp3 album I had downloaded and copied into iTunes on my iPhone (1st gen, not a 3G), but every song was stuttering and skipping.  The files themselves are fine&#8211;they all play fine in iTunes.  The file I was trying to play had the following attributes:
Bitrate: 96 kbps
Encoder: FhG
Tags: ID3 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just synced an mp3 album I had downloaded and copied into iTunes on my iPhone (1st gen, not a 3G), but every song was stuttering and skipping.  The files themselves are fine&#8211;they all play fine in iTunes.  The file I was trying to play had the following attributes:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Bitrate:</strong> 96 kbps<br />
<strong>Encoder:</strong> FhG<br />
<strong>Tags:</strong> ID3 v1/v2<br />
<strong>Sample Rate:</strong> 44.100 khz</p></blockquote>
<p>Trolling through online forums, the following advice was offered:</p>
<ul>
<li>Use the &#8220;Rock EQ&#8221; preset (didn&#8217;t work for me, and I tried turning EQ Off / Soundcheck On/Off too)</li>
<li>Restore the iPhone (that sounds like a pain)</li>
<li>Delete the playlist and remove all the songs from the phone, then create a new playlist and resync them</li>
<li>Convert the music to AAC (right-click, convert to AAC)</li>
</ul>
<p>Since the last option is the easiest, I tried it.  And it worked&#8211;smooth playback.  It&#8217;s possible that there really was something horrible with the files, as they stutter in VLC too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/iphone-mp3-skipping-works-in-itunes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Love iTunes 8 Genius Feature!</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/i-love-itunes-8-genius-feature/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/i-love-itunes-8-genius-feature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/09/09/i-love-itunes-8-genius-feature/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iTunes 8 has a new feature called Genius.  Gizmodo says, &#8220;In time, Genius playlists should get more useful, but I think I&#8217;ll still stick to Pandora when I want to mix things up.&#8221;  However, I&#8217;m pretty satisfied with them, as they provide a non-linear way to dig into related music in your library. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iTunes 8 has a new feature called Genius.  <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5047409/itunes-8-available-for-download-now-we-test-it-out">Gizmodo says</a>, &#8220;In time, Genius playlists should get more useful, but I think I&#8217;ll still stick to Pandora when I want to mix things up.&#8221;  However, I&#8217;m pretty satisfied with them, as they provide a non-linear way to dig into related music in your library.  For example, Eric Clapton&#8217;s classic Old Love brings up a bunch of oldies, as well as some other Eric Clapton / Cream tunes:</p>
<p><img id="image2746" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/itunes-8-clapton.png" alt="itunes-8-clapton.png" /></p>
<p>If I feel like pop, picking Danity Kane explodes more pop:</p>
<p><img id="image2747" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/itunes-8-nice.png" alt="itunes-8-nice.png" /></p>
<p>And an Ice Cube song brings the hilarity:</p>
<p><img id="image2748" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/itunes-8-hilarity.png" alt="itunes-8-hilarity.png" /></p>
<p>iTunes 8 is definitely psychic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/i-love-itunes-8-genius-feature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shure E4c-n / SE420 Review</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/shure-e4c-n-se420-review/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/shure-e4c-n-se420-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod Shuffle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/02/19/shure-e4c-n-se420-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bought a pair of Shure E4c-n earphones about 6 months ago from Amazon, and I have to say they are the best I&#8217;ve ever owned.  They have a 4/5 star review on Amazon with 50 reviews; their newer cousin the SE420 has similar reviews.  Here&#8217;s what they look like:

The sound isolation is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a pair of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000E5EF70?tag=elliottback-20&#038;camp=14573&#038;creative=327641&#038;linkCode=as1&#038;creativeASIN=B000E5EF70&#038;adid=027D76T1VHS0XAQHDF7F&#038;">Shure E4c-n earphones</a> about 6 months ago from Amazon, and I have to say they are the best I&#8217;ve ever owned.  They have a 4/5 star review on Amazon with 50 reviews; their newer cousin the <a href="http://shure.com/PersonalAudio/Products/Earphones/SEModels/us_pa_se420_content">SE420</a> has similar reviews.  Here&#8217;s what they look like:</p>
<p><img id="image2549" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/shure-e4c-n.jpg" alt="shure-e4c-n.jpg" /></p>
<p>The sound isolation is orders better than any other headphones I&#8217;ve tried, and the frequency response is excellent.  My coworkers, two of whom bought similar or identical Shure earphones, also swear by them.  You can be sitting on the worst part of the NYC subway line with them on, and not hear the pain of the wheels screeching on ill fitted metal tracks.</p>
<p>A reviewer on Amazon <a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/R357BHCGTM7RLS/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm">praises the sound quality</a> better than I can:</p>
<blockquote><p>These IEMs sound absolutely incredible. They sound is so clear and detailed that I notice new details in songs that I had listened to dozens if not hundreds of time. In a complex musical passage it is easy to follow every note of a single instrument which is not an easy feat with most headphones.</p></blockquote>
<p>As for <strong>Customer Service</strong>, it&#8217;s the best.  My earphones started wearing out in 6 months at the cord junction where it meets the plug, and they are sending me an advance replacement (against my CC) of the SE420s.  When I get them I&#8217;ll send back the defectives to the Customer rep who took my warranty replacement and they&#8217;ll reverse the charge.  Another customer had a similar, great experience:</p>
<blockquote><p>As for Shure customer service&#8211;I had a suspected loose wire in one of the E3 earphones (used for 8 months) leading to dropouts when I would move my head. I got a return form off the Shure website&#8211;filled it out and sent it along with a copy of my receipt to Shure. Within 10 days, they had sent out a completely new pair at no charge.</p></blockquote>
<p>Even Apple doesn&#8217;t offer this level of personalized customer service.  I&#8217;m extremely impressed, and with their 2 year warranty, I&#8217;ll definitely buy again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/shure-e4c-n-se420-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Zune 2.0 matter?</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/does-the-zune-20-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/does-the-zune-20-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 04:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/10/13/does-the-zune-20-matter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Zune 2.0 is coming out, but with more of a whimper than a bang.  The new features include new flash models, a black 80GB hard drive model, WiFi syncing, podcast and recorded TV support, according to An in-depth look at the new Zune lineup by Ars Technica.  Additionally, these new features will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Zune 2.0 is coming out, but with more of a whimper than a bang.  The new features include new flash models, a black 80GB hard drive model, WiFi syncing, podcast and recorded TV support, according to <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071003-an-in-depth-look-at-the-new-zune-lineup.html">An in-depth look at the new Zune lineup</a> by Ars Technica.  Additionally, these new features will be made available to Zune 1.0 users through a firmware update.</p>
<p><img id="image2445" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/zune-zune.jpg" alt="zune-zune.jpg" /></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/gartenberg/archives/2007/10/zunes_messaging.html">Is this a new product announcement or an apology?</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The Zune 2 is basically what the Zune 1 should have been.  Its online music store / syncing tool has been rewritten to be as easy to use as iTunes.  Hopefully this new Zune will sell more than the paltry 1.2 million units its predecessor sold, but I&#8217;m not optimistic.  Now that Apple has released their touch-based devices, Microsoft, and every other portable device maker not using touchscreens, is simply a loser.  Why would I buy a device with a tiny screen to watch movies on when I can buy a device that removes all the clunky wheel controls and fills all the available space with a gorgeous widescreen?</p>
<p>Specification-wise, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/03/zune-vs-ipod-specification-smackdown/">new Zune and iPod touch are basically identical</a>, but interface wise, its a completely different story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/does-the-zune-20-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
