<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Elliott C. Back &#187; Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/category/vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Vista Bug #1: Can I? Can I?</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/vista-bug-1-can-i-can-i/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/vista-bug-1-can-i-can-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 04:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/04/08/vista-bug-1-can-i-can-i/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Vista likes to play &#8220;Mother may I?&#8221; and ask you EVERY damn time it wants to do something if it&#8217;s allowed to, even for services that should be certified as its own:


Why should I have to approve its own activation component?  Its rundll components?  It&#8217;s hardware installation components?  I believe in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Vista likes to play &#8220;Mother may I?&#8221; and ask you EVERY damn time it wants to do something if it&#8217;s allowed to, even for services that should be certified as its own:</p>
<p><a href="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/vista-activation-requires-security-approval.jpg"><img id="image1331" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/vista-activation-requires-security-approval-thumb.jpg" alt="vista-activation-requires-security-approval.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
<p>Why should I have to approve its own activation component?  Its rundll components?  It&#8217;s hardware installation components?  I believe in a more secure architecture, but really Microsoft, this is taking the security iniative a little too far.  As a consumer, I just want it to run&#8211;security decisions should be made behind my back.  Especially for operating system components.  What does it say for your system when it doesn&#8217;t even trust itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/vista-bug-1-can-i-can-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>205</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
