<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Elliott C. Back &#187; Wordpress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/category/wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>WP SuperCache .htaccess mod_rewrite rules for Blogs in Subdomains/Subdirectories</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-supercache-htaccess/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-supercache-htaccess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mod_Rewrite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/?p=3165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a unique problem, which is that I have installed my wordpress to a subdirectory, and symlinked httpdocs from several subdomains to that directory.  The structure looks like this:
httpdocs/wp/ -&#62; WP Install
subdomains/gadgets/httpdocs/ -&#62; /elliottback.com/httpdocs/wp/
subdomains/books/httpdocs/ -&#62; /elliottback.com/httpdocs/wp/
This means that from my domain, we&#8217;re always sticking an extra /wp onto things, but from the subdomains, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a unique problem, which is that I have installed my wordpress to a subdirectory, and symlinked <strong>httpdocs</strong> from several subdomains to that directory.  The structure looks like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>httpdocs/wp/ -&gt; WP Install<br />
subdomains/gadgets/httpdocs/ -&gt; /elliottback.com/httpdocs/wp/<br />
subdomains/books/httpdocs/ -&gt; /elliottback.com/httpdocs/wp/</p></blockquote>
<p>This means that from my domain, we&#8217;re always sticking an extra /wp onto things, but from the subdomains, they go directly into the wp-content directories from the root , in both relative and absolute sense.  I consolidated my subdomains this way so that I could run a single WP install and maintain them together.  Here&#8217;s the .htaccess file that lets WP Super Cache work on either of them:</p>
<pre class="brush:apache"># BEGIN WPSuperCache
&lt;ifmodule mod_rewrite.c&gt;
RewriteEngine On
AddDefaultCharset UTF-8
RewriteBase /
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^.*[^/]$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^.*//.*$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} !=POST
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} !.*=.*
RewriteCond %{HTTP:Cookie} !^.*(comment_author_|wordpress|wp-postpass_).*$
RewriteCond %{HTTP:Accept-Encoding} gzip
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^(/wp)?/
RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}%1/wp-content/cache/supercache/%{HTTP_HOST}/%1/$1/index.html.gz -f
RewriteRule ^(.*) %1/wp-content/cache/supercache/%{HTTP_HOST}/%1/$1/index.html.gz [L]

RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^.*[^/]$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^.*//.*$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} !=POST
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} !.*=.*
RewriteCond %{HTTP:Cookie} !^.*(comment_author_|wordpress|wp-postpass_).*$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^(/wp)?/
RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}%1/wp-content/cache/supercache/%{HTTP_HOST}%1/$1/index.html -f
RewriteRule ^(.*) %1/wp-content/cache/supercache/%{HTTP_HOST}%1/$1/index.html [L]
&lt;/ifmodule&gt;
# END WPSuperCache</pre>
<p>Let me know what you think&#8211;performance stats show that it&#8217;s working fine for both the /wp subdirectory and the other subdomains!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-supercache-htaccess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt is not Wordpress</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/matt-is-not-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/matt-is-not-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/?p=3013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Mullenweg is the creator of Wordpress, but recently his blog entries feature mostly galleries of jealousy-inducing photographs taken on jaunts around the globe on some high-end camera equipment.  Few, if any, have anything to do with the Wordpress blogging software.  Most Wordpress-focused posts now come from the official Wordpress blog.

Since half of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ma.tt/" rel="nofollow">Matt Mullenweg</a> is the creator of Wordpress, but recently his blog entries feature mostly galleries of jealousy-inducing photographs taken on jaunts around the globe on some high-end camera equipment.  Few, if any, have anything to do with the Wordpress blogging software.  Most Wordpress-focused posts now come from the official <a href="http://wordpress.org/development/">Wordpress blog</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/wordpress-news-spam.png"><img src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/wordpress-news-spam-450x216.png" alt="" title="wordpress-news-spam" width="450" height="216" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3014" /></a></p>
<p>Since half of the items in my dashboard are currently irrelevant to me as a Wordpress user, hopefully the time is approaching when Matt&#8217;s personal feed will be replaced or removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/matt-is-not-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WP Super Cache Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-super-cache-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-super-cache-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scalability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/09/28/wp-super-cache-benchmark/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve thought about whether upgrading from WP Cache 2.0 to WP Super Cache is a good idea, hopefully this benchmark will convince you.  I followed my instructions on benchmarking Wordpress with Apache Bench on four configurations of this blog&#8217;s main page to measure performance: 

Without any caching plugins
With WP Cache 2.0
With WP Super [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve thought about whether upgrading from <a href="http://mnm.uib.es/gallir/wp-cache-2/">WP Cache 2.0</a> to <a href="http://ocaoimh.ie/wp-super-cache/">WP Super Cache</a> is a good idea, hopefully this benchmark will convince you.  I followed my instructions on <a href="http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/01/14/benchmarking-wordpress-with-apache-bench/">benchmarking Wordpress with Apache Bench</a> on four configurations of this blog&#8217;s main page to measure performance: </p>
<ol>
<li>Without any caching plugins</li>
<li>With WP Cache 2.0</li>
<li>With WP Super Cache (no compression)</li>
<li>With WP Super Cache (compression enabled)</li>
</ol>
<p><img id="image2759" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/wp-caching-plugins.png" alt="wp-caching-plugins.png" /></p>
<p>The results show that <strong>WP Super Cache</strong> is a clear winner, performing 225% better than the older WP Cache.  Here is the raw data I gathered during the test:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>No caching:</strong><br />
Requests per second:    22.81 [#/sec] (mean)<br />
Time per request:       4383.559 [ms] (mean)<br />
Time per request:       43.836 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)<br />
Transfer rate:          613.75 [Kbytes/sec] received</p>
<p><strong>WP cache:</strong><br />
Requests per second:    872.30 [#/sec] (mean)<br />
Time per request:       114.640 [ms] (mean)<br />
Time per request:       1.146 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)<br />
Transfer rate:          23549.46 [Kbytes/sec] received</p>
<p><strong>Super cache (no compression):</strong><br />
Requests per second:    1518.90 [#/sec] (mean)<br />
Time per request:       65.837 [ms] (mean)<br />
Time per request:       0.658 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)<br />
Transfer rate:          41150.81 [Kbytes/sec] received</p>
<p><strong>Super cache (compression):</strong><br />
Requests per second:    1960.39 [#/sec] (mean)<br />
Time per request:       51.010 [ms] (mean)<br />
Time per request:       0.510 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)<br />
Transfer rate:          53108.70 [Kbytes/sec] received</p></blockquote>
<p>For more tips on how to improve your Wordpress performance, check out <a href="http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/04/15/why-my-wordpress-site-is-so-much-faster-than-yours/">Wordpress Performance: Why My Site Is So Much Faster Than Yours</a>. Another interesting WP caching plugin is <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/batcache/">Batcache</a>, which uses the memcached backend to serve requests out of a cluster of machines&#8217; RAM memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-super-cache-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wordpress.org 2.5 Redesign</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/wordpressorg-25-redesign/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/wordpressorg-25-redesign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/03/29/wordpressorg-25-redesign/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the release of their latest version of Wordpress, 2.5, the official Wordpress site has undergone a redesign by Happy Cog studios:


The main page has been refreshed in boring, pastel colours, and prominent links to their Wordpress for Dummies book via Amazon affiliate link and their hosting affiliate suggestions have been added.  I&#8217;m honestly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the release of their latest version of Wordpress, 2.5, the <a href="http://wordpress.org">official Wordpress site</a> has undergone a redesign by <a href="http://www.happycog.com/">Happy Cog studios</a>:</p>
<p><img id="image2582" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/wordpress-25.png" alt="wordpress-25.png" /></p>
<div style="float:right; padding:10px;"><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<p>The main page has been refreshed in boring, pastel colours, and prominent links to their <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0470149469?ie=UTF8&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;tag=hpug&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0470149469">Wordpress for Dummies</a> book via Amazon affiliate link and their <a href="http://wordpress.org/hosting/">hosting affiliate suggestions</a> have been added.  I&#8217;m honestly not impressed with the redesign, which has included work on the <a href="http://wordpress.org/development/2008/03/25-sneak-peek/">administrative interface</a>:</p>
<p><img id="image2584" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/wordpress-25-admin-fixed.png" alt="wordpress-25-admin.png" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s as if they took the strong ideas and colors of Wordpress past, watered them down, spaced them out, and made sure everything looks sufficiently web 2.0 without actually adding a substantial improvement.  Every administrative screen now looks different and inconsistent with the others.  If I upgrade, I&#8217;m definitely going to miss the old theme.  On the other hand, no work had been done since Wordpress 1.5 on the administrative look and feel, so any work, regardless of how it feels, is welcome.  Perhaps this is just a stepping stone to a truly better admin panel?</p>
<p>The <a href="http://wordpress.org/development/2008/03/wordpress-25-brecker/">WP 2.5 release notes</a> blog post indicates some other nice changes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Multi-file upload with progress bar</li>
<li>EXIF extraction (the photobloggers will love this)</li>
<li>Password strength meter</li>
<li>Few-click plugin upgrades (I am expecting some 0day exploits here)</li>
<li>Built-in galleries</li>
<li>A new <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Shortcode_API">Shortcode API</a> (Isn&#8217;t this just BBCode ripped off?)</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ll probably end up installing this with the next release of my own blogs and themes, as the features look promising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/wordpressorg-25-redesign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wordpress Founder Slams Six Apart</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/wordpress-founder-slams-six-apart/</link>
		<comments>http://elliottback.com/wp/wordpress-founder-slams-six-apart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/03/11/wordpress-founder-slams-six-apart/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Techcrunch has a hilarious exchange of fire between Wordpress founder Matt Mullenweg and Six Apart&#8217;s evangelist Anil Dash over the relative merits of Wordpress and MovableType:
Anil Dash:  &#8220;WordPress 2.5 is about to be released, and we wanted to encourage WordPress users to upgrade. To Movable Type.&#8221;
Matt Mullenweg:  &#8220;Six apart is getting desperate, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Techcrunch has a hilarious exchange of fire between Wordpress founder Matt Mullenweg and Six Apart&#8217;s evangelist Anil Dash over the <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/11/six-apart-takes-aim-at-wordpress-users-wordpress-pissed/">relative merits of Wordpress and MovableType</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.movabletype.com/blog/2008/03/a-wordpress-25-upgrade-guide.html">Anil Dash:</a>  &#8220;WordPress 2.5 is about to be released, and we wanted to encourage WordPress users to upgrade. To Movable Type.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/photomatt/statuses/769658891">Matt Mullenweg:</a>  &#8220;Six apart is getting desperate, and dirty.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/anildash/statuses/769661018">Anil Dash:</a>  &#8220;Desperation is resorting to name-calling and slander instead of substance — if there’s a factual error, i&#8217;m glad to fix it.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><img id="image2573" src="http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/wp-vs-movable-type.png" alt="wp-vs-movable-type.png" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written before about how <a href="http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/05/11/wordpress-vs-mt/">I personally prefer Wordpress to Movable Type</a> because it offers me an unprecedented open source experience, tons of community support, and easy hackability.  It&#8217;s also pretty damn fast, so I don&#8217;t worry about my server crashing or overloading.</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s also totally ok in the competitive marketplace of free blogging software for one manufacturer to directly tote its own features in comparison to another piece of software.  What&#8217;s wrong with saying that Movable Type has features x, y, and z that Wordpress is still dreaming of?</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Mullenweg, of Wordpress, has followed up his Twitter with a post <a href="http://ma.tt/2008/03/wordpress-is-open-source/">Wordpress Is Open Source</a>, in which he says &#8220;I had held off criticizing [MovableType and Six Apart] after they went OS and before they decided to start an all-out confrontation because that’s not generally what OS projects do to each other.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elliottback.com/wp/wordpress-founder-slams-six-apart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
