<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil Sucks At Search (Go Google!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:40:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sanjana Sharma</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/#comment-2085847</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjana Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/07/29/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/#comment-2085847</guid>
		<description>I cant believe how dumb cuil is.. first people would be confused..is it ciul or cuil?

First I tried my searching my business &quot;Cafebpo&quot;... I was speechless when I saw it threw an error 
&quot;No results were found for: cafebpo

If you’ve checked your spelling, you could try using fewer or different keywords to broaden your search.&quot;

How much fewer words, idiots ??

Then with easy searches, the search results dont look like a normal search engine search results...

I will never go back to cuil or ciul or whatever carp. After hearing their VC story, I hate VCs even more !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant believe how dumb cuil is.. first people would be confused..is it ciul or cuil?</p>
<p>First I tried my searching my business &#8220;Cafebpo&#8221;&#8230; I was speechless when I saw it threw an error<br />
&#8220;No results were found for: cafebpo</p>
<p>If you’ve checked your spelling, you could try using fewer or different keywords to broaden your search.&#8221;</p>
<p>How much fewer words, idiots ??</p>
<p>Then with easy searches, the search results dont look like a normal search engine search results&#8230;</p>
<p>I will never go back to cuil or ciul or whatever carp. After hearing their VC story, I hate VCs even more !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Mielus</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/#comment-1959443</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Mielus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/07/29/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/#comment-1959443</guid>
		<description>Poor search results = cuil.com .... period.

Demonstration:

My name is Mielus.
Compare http://www.cuil.com/search?q=Mielus
with
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Mielus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor search results = <a href="http://cuil.com" title="http://cuil.com" target="_blank">cuil.com</a> &#8230;. period.</p>
<p>Demonstration:</p>
<p>My name is Mielus.<br />
Compare <a href="http://www.cuil.com/search?q=Mielus" rel="nofollow">http://www.cuil.com/search?q=Mielus</a><br />
with<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Mielus" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Mielus</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asztal</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/#comment-1937863</link>
		<dc:creator>Asztal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/07/29/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/#comment-1937863</guid>
		<description>A few days ago, searching for &quot;cuil&quot; itself returned completely useless results. Seems they&#039;ve fixed it now, but it was an excellent, slightly ironic, example of how it fails.

Also, I&#039;m sure I read somewhere that Google&#039;s index has reached 1 trillion URLs (granted, they&#039;re not all unique pages).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago, searching for &#8220;cuil&#8221; itself returned completely useless results. Seems they&#8217;ve fixed it now, but it was an excellent, slightly ironic, example of how it fails.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m sure I read somewhere that Google&#8217;s index has reached 1 trillion URLs (granted, they&#8217;re not all unique pages).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard P</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/#comment-1935407</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 07:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/07/29/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/#comment-1935407</guid>
		<description>I searched a common shopping term &amp; the 2nd site listed tried to download a virus. Not cuil.

It would be a shame though, if this mess influenced the next possible worthy SE contender to not enter the fray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I searched a common shopping term &amp; the 2nd site listed tried to download a virus. Not cuil.</p>
<p>It would be a shame though, if this mess influenced the next possible worthy SE contender to not enter the fray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/#comment-1922971</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 05:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2008/07/29/cuil-sucks-at-search-go-google/#comment-1922971</guid>
		<description>Depending on the search term used, I have found photos on my listing that don&#039;t belong to me, and I have found my original, copyrighted photo on a competitors listing.

They have a right to take a snippet from my site.  They do not have a right to use my copyrighted photo to promote a competitors site!

I&#039;m waiting to see how long it takes for this stupid idea to get fixed.  It&#039;s a simple fix - if the photo ain&#039;t from the site being listed, don&#039;t use it!

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depending on the search term used, I have found photos on my listing that don&#8217;t belong to me, and I have found my original, copyrighted photo on a competitors listing.</p>
<p>They have a right to take a snippet from my site.  They do not have a right to use my copyrighted photo to promote a competitors site!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting to see how long it takes for this stupid idea to get fixed.  It&#8217;s a simple fix &#8211; if the photo ain&#8217;t from the site being listed, don&#8217;t use it!</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
