<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Suggest Censors Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/google-suggest-censors-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/google-suggest-censors-results/</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:40:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/google-suggest-censors-results/#comment-2188324</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 07:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=198#comment-2188324</guid>
		<description>Actually, it does not suggest the n word, but rather suggests nigga, also it doesn&#039;t suggest shit, in addition to avoiding the word fuck. Actually google almost seems to go through logical contortions to avoid &quot;unsensitive&quot; suggestions. I can understand their need to be polite considering the Internet is also for children and those with the mental fortitude of children, I find it an obstacle when I am conducting research and get the feeling that google is trying to be &quot;sensitive&quot; or that they are bowing to presure. Why not offer &quot;uncensored&quot; google for the grownups and &quot;censored&quot; google for those without the wearwithal to deal with harsh language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it does not suggest the n word, but rather suggests nigga, also it doesn&#8217;t suggest <acronym title="shit">****</acronym>, in addition to avoiding the word <acronym title="fuck">****</acronym>. Actually google almost seems to go through logical contortions to avoid &#8220;unsensitive&#8221; suggestions. I can understand their need to be polite considering the Internet is also for children and those with the mental fortitude of children, I find it an obstacle when I am conducting research and get the feeling that google is trying to be &#8220;sensitive&#8221; or that they are bowing to presure. Why not offer &#8220;uncensored&#8221; google for the grownups and &#8220;censored&#8221; google for those without the wearwithal to deal with harsh language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magic Bean Dip</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/google-suggest-censors-results/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Magic Bean Dip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=198#comment-406</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Suggest&lt;/strong&gt;
In the gaggle of  posts on the new Google Suggest Beta  search tool, these are the ones I&#039;ve found notable:

Best Quote: That&#039;s right-Google doesn&#039;t suggest &quot;sex.&quot; by  Elliot Back  (And here I thought Google Guy was tight-lipped)

Most U...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Suggest</strong><br />
In the gaggle of  posts on the new Google Suggest Beta  search tool, these are the ones I&#8217;ve found notable:</p>
<p>Best Quote: That&#8217;s right-Google doesn&#8217;t suggest &#8220;<acronym title="sex">***</acronym>.&#8221; by  Elliot Back  (And here I thought Google Guy was tight-lipped)</p>
<p>Most U&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangeguru</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/google-suggest-censors-results/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>orangeguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=198#comment-397</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, now I know there is no Sex for me - since even google can&#039;t find any?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, now I know there is no <acronym title="Sex">***</acronym> for me &#8211; since even google can&#8217;t find any?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetallicaRat</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/google-suggest-censors-results/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>MetallicaRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2004 06:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=198#comment-352</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s still Beta, that&#039;s probably why it hasn&#039;t been thoroughly gone through yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still Beta, that&#8217;s probably why it hasn&#8217;t been thoroughly gone through yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
