<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reuters Faked Beirut Photo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:40:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NerdStarGamer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Worst Use of Clone Tool Ever</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/#comment-208335</link>
		<dc:creator>NerdStarGamer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Worst Use of Clone Tool Ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/08/06/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/#comment-208335</guid>
		<description>[...] Reuters Faked Beirut Photo by Elliott Back [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reuters Faked Beirut Photo by Elliott Back [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ItsBadBusiness</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/#comment-162079</link>
		<dc:creator>ItsBadBusiness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/08/06/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/#comment-162079</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Seeing is Believing - Unless its a Doctored Photograph of Lebanon Published by Reuters...&lt;/strong&gt;

Unfortunately, its been revealed that we&#039;ve been had. A noteworthy photo on the Reuters website was doctored by its freelance, Lebanese photographer. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Seeing is Believing &#8211; Unless its a Doctored Photograph of Lebanon Published by Reuters&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Unfortunately, its been revealed that we&#8217;ve been had. A noteworthy photo on the Reuters website was doctored by its freelance, Lebanese photographer. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NICK</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/#comment-158982</link>
		<dc:creator>NICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/08/06/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/#comment-158982</guid>
		<description>BRILLIANT GRAMMAR,JOHN........I  SUPPORT PETE&#039;S COMMENTS............THIS IS VERY EMBARRASSING.....REUTERS EDITORS SHOULD BE FIRED NOT JUST THE PHOTOGRAHER.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT GRAMMAR,JOHN&#8230;&#8230;..I  SUPPORT PETE&#8217;S COMMENTS&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;THIS IS VERY EMBARRASSING&#8230;..REUTERS EDITORS SHOULD BE FIRED NOT JUST THE PHOTOGRAHER&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Good Stuff</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/#comment-158266</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Good Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 21:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/08/06/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/#comment-158266</guid>
		<description>This looks so poorly done - I think Reuters just wanted to get in the news !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks so poorly done &#8211; I think Reuters just wanted to get in the news !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/#comment-158219</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/08/06/reuters-faked-beirut-photo/#comment-158219</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Pete that it seems odd to doctor a photo that already adequately illustrates the caption. Then, that the smoke is so poorly and obviously blotted seems like an egregious error for anyone let alone a professional when you consider they must have suspected, if not hoped, that the picture would serve a world wide audience. Sensational or not, it just looks fake. You&#8217;ve made a very interesting point, Pete.</p>
<p>While I respect Grammar Nazi&#8217;s pertinacity for following up with the lesson I&#8217;d also like to suggest that before he/she considers going on another lofty tirade that they understand they&#8217;ve proven nothing other than they have the attention span of a gnat and the maturity of a toddler. How apropos that our loquacious executioner have the ego of, well, a Nazi. Despite his errors Pete&#8217;s observation was stated clear enough and making light of them simply draws more undue attention to the grammar from the picture and Pete’s provocative commentary. </p>
<p>When a response is made in a forum such as this which offers unique commentary or stimulates debates around an intriguing idea or theorem it should be embraced without fear of near sighted reprisal from the sinister leather tongue of the stereotypical practitioner of grammar. I&#8217;m all for effective communication but this is neither the place for a soap box nor the time to step up on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
