<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/rss-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/rss-ethics/</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:40:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Bäck</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/rss-ethics/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Bäck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=545#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s generally impossible--search engines have to willfully release that data, and Google, for one, doesn&#039;t.  If you have a Google AdWords account you can see traffic estimates for certain keywords, though.  Overture is a bit better--it gives you a tool to tell you the number of searches done for a particular term 6 months ago:

http://inventory.overture.com/d/searchinventory/suggestion/

See this page for more:  

http://www.storebuilder.co.uk/article154.html

As to the question of ethics, I see no problem with finding out whether people are searching for specific terms, even to the point where you know (like Google does) which people are searching for what terms!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s generally impossible&#8211;search engines have to willfully release that data, and Google, for one, doesn&#8217;t.  If you have a Google AdWords account you can see traffic estimates for certain keywords, though.  Overture is a bit better&#8211;it gives you a tool to tell you the number of searches done for a particular term 6 months ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://inventory.overture.com/d/searchinventory/suggestion/" rel="nofollow">http://inventory.overture.com/d/searchinventory/suggestion/</a></p>
<p>See this page for more:  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.storebuilder.co.uk/article154.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.storebuilder.co.uk/article154.html</a></p>
<p>As to the question of ethics, I see no problem with finding out whether people are searching for specific terms, even to the point where you know (like Google does) which people are searching for what terms!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/rss-ethics/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=545#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>Elliot

Long time reader of your blog.  Simply a lurker that can add nothing to your stuff.  I admire a lot of what you do.

I&#039;ve been trying to find out if it is possible to access search string caches on sites such as google.  Simply as a tool to be able to query popular searches or even if specific searches have been done.  First, is the possible?  Second, is it ethical if the information is only used for personal gratification?  Third, do you know how to do it? Fourth, would you share it with me?

Take Care
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elliot</p>
<p>Long time reader of your blog.  Simply a lurker that can add nothing to your stuff.  I admire a lot of what you do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to find out if it is possible to access search string caches on sites such as google.  Simply as a tool to be able to query popular searches or even if specific searches have been done.  First, is the possible?  Second, is it ethical if the information is only used for personal gratification?  Third, do you know how to do it? Fourth, would you share it with me?</p>
<p>Take Care<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
