<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari 3 Windows Review, Benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:40:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HannibalTheCrow</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comment-2074541</link>
		<dc:creator>HannibalTheCrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/06/11/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comment-2074541</guid>
		<description>I like it personally.  I like the simple look but that is just me.  I like the speed of it.  There have been a couple of sites that wouldn&#039;t load but that happens with all browsers for me.  But, I will continue to use it until it don&#039;t serve me well then it will hit the trash can quicker than it was here.  But, personally, I like it so far.  Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it personally.  I like the simple look but that is just me.  I like the speed of it.  There have been a couple of sites that wouldn&#8217;t load but that happens with all browsers for me.  But, I will continue to use it until it don&#8217;t serve me well then it will hit the trash can quicker than it was here.  But, personally, I like it so far.  Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apro</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comment-1725441</link>
		<dc:creator>Apro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/06/11/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comment-1725441</guid>
		<description>I think its important to take opera in all your browser benchamrks, cause that probably is the best browser available today.

Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its important to take opera in all your browser benchamrks, cause that probably is the best browser available today.</p>
<p>Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTURNER</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comment-1120860</link>
		<dc:creator>PTURNER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/06/11/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comment-1120860</guid>
		<description>I tried this browser and found 2 annoyances;
1) You can&#039;t change the look...the grey metal look gets a little tired.
2) It&#039;s a memory pig. With the task manager running, it fired up at about 45,000 k and was quickly up to 106,000 k and wouldn&#039;t return any memory as tabs were closed. Opera started at around 35,000 k and never passed 75,000 k, no matter how many tabs were open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried this browser and found 2 annoyances;<br />
1) You can&#8217;t change the look&#8230;the grey metal look gets a little tired.<br />
2) It&#8217;s a memory pig. With the task manager running, it fired up at about 45,000 k and was quickly up to 106,000 k and wouldn&#8217;t return any memory as tabs were closed. Opera started at around 35,000 k and never passed 75,000 k, no matter how many tabs were open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blinkdt</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comment-998412</link>
		<dc:creator>blinkdt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/06/11/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comment-998412</guid>
		<description>I loaded up Safari for Windows and uninstalled after using it for about an hour. I could not locate a single Website that rendered correctly. I did not experience the crashes and freeze-ups that y&#039;all are describing, but I did witness the pitifully poor performance of this third-rate piece of crap. It&#039;s in BETA, you say? Looks to me like it&#039;s barely off the drawing table.

No, I won&#039;t be loading up any further issues. Why would I, when I have the speed, the elegance, the reliability, the compatibility of IE7? It&#039;s beautiful baby, sorry for you.

Game over, IE wins, and by a fantastically wide margin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loaded up Safari for Windows and uninstalled after using it for about an hour. I could not locate a single Website that rendered correctly. I did not experience the crashes and freeze-ups that y&#8217;all are describing, but I did witness the pitifully poor performance of this third-rate piece of <acronym title="crap">****</acronym>. It&#8217;s in BETA, you say? Looks to me like it&#8217;s barely off the drawing table.</p>
<p>No, I won&#8217;t be loading up any further issues. Why would I, when I have the speed, the elegance, the reliability, the compatibility of IE7? It&#8217;s beautiful baby, sorry for you.</p>
<p>Game over, IE wins, and by a fantastically wide margin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogoSquare &#124; Safari is out for Windows, go get it!</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comment-986067</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogoSquare &#124; Safari is out for Windows, go get it!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2007/06/11/safari-3-windows-review-benchmark/#comment-986067</guid>
		<description>[...] Safari 3 Windows Review, Benchmark [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Safari 3 Windows Review, Benchmark [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
