Comments on: Songbird? No bloatware, thanks.

By: zezius

zezius — Thu, 05 Apr 2007 06:53:23 +0000

Hey guys, don’t forget. The guys behind sunbird are also the guys behind Winamp. The success and reliability of Winamp will one day be the same for SongBird too.. and Firefox rules so XUL technology is fine.

By: Eli

Eli — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 21:26:32 +0000

WOW!! Elliott you are so freakin’ stupid. Obviously there are bound to be tons of bugs making it run slower, and less stable then WMP. It’s still in production you imbecile! When WMP 11 came out on the Vista pre-release, it crashed on my system and I’m using the latest hp laptop (dv5000 series). This is supposed to be coming from some big time corporation with plenty of other working versions of WMP. So how is it that there newest version sucks more then this version of Songbird? Songbird has never crashed on me. So before you start ranting, wait for the final release of Songbird. It’s gonna kick ***.

By: oneseadog

oneseadog — Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:40:07 +0000

Bahh.. Songbird? How on Big (fat bloated) Bird? Won’t even start. Not on this ol’ box that’ll run 4 instances of Winamp281 Discovery is good exercise, sharpens the eye. Will it go to intavenous feeding of every mental process? I am old (school, too) but I can still manage to cut/paste, drag/drop. The idea needs fewer supersize meals.

By: sux

sux — Mon, 24 Apr 2006 03:41:10 +0000

Crashed within 5 seconds of install; now, won’t even load. Proof of Concept?? Well, the concept fails.

By: Alex

Alex — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:37:44 +0000

Songbird is, at the moment, only a Proof of concept. That means neither that is works on every computer, nor that it’s fast, stable, or resource-efficient.