<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;We are so Secure,&#8221; they cry, hacked full of holes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elliottback.com/wp/we-are-so-secure-they-cry-hacked-full-of-holes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/we-are-so-secure-they-cry-hacked-full-of-holes/</link>
	<description>Internet &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:40:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: roger malcovich</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/we-are-so-secure-they-cry-hacked-full-of-holes/#comment-14074</link>
		<dc:creator>roger malcovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 05:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=835#comment-14074</guid>
		<description>This is a line from the link you provided:

&quot;Linux users who patched their systems for a serious security vulnerability in KDE last month will have to patch once again, due to errors in the original patch, according to the KDE project.&quot;

Was there not patches for system pack 2? I rest my case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a line from the link you provided:</p>
<p>&#8220;Linux users who patched their systems for a serious security vulnerability in KDE last month will have to patch once again, due to errors in the original patch, according to the KDE project.&#8221;</p>
<p>Was there not patches for system pack 2? I rest my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aphyr</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/we-are-so-secure-they-cry-hacked-full-of-holes/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>Aphyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=835#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>Can we slam you for being a Microsoft zealot? Or would that be in bad taste? ;-)

*ducks*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we slam you for being a Microsoft zealot? Or would that be in bad taste? <img src='http://elliottback.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>*ducks*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/we-are-so-secure-they-cry-hacked-full-of-holes/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 06:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=835#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>KDE: I&#039;m a desktop environment, damn it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KDE: I&#8217;m a desktop environment, damn it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Back</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/we-are-so-secure-they-cry-hacked-full-of-holes/#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 01:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=835#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>Since Clau directly addresses me and tells me to grow up, and Jon wonders how I explain using Wordpress, I tell them both:  this post, if you actually read it, is anti-zealotry post, not an anti-open-source post.  In this case, the zeolots I&#039;m slamming are open-source zeolots, but if they were microsofties, they would get the same treatment.  The argument that software availability leads to better throwaway security is ridiculous.

That&#039;s all.  There&#039;s good open source and closed source software, but neither model is more secure because of abundance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Clau directly addresses me and tells me to grow up, and Jon wonders how I explain using Wordpress, I tell them both:  this post, if you actually read it, is anti-zealotry post, not an anti-open-source post.  In this case, the zeolots I&#8217;m slamming are open-source zeolots, but if they were microsofties, they would get the same treatment.  The argument that software availability leads to better throwaway security is ridiculous.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all.  There&#8217;s good open source and closed source software, but neither model is more secure because of abundance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://elliottback.com/wp/we-are-so-secure-they-cry-hacked-full-of-holes/#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=835#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>Heh, you are bashing OpenSource and using WordPress for you website? How do you explain that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, you are bashing OpenSource and using WordPress for you website? How do you explain that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
